Showing posts with label tax -and bill- collecting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tax -and bill- collecting. Show all posts

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Governmentalism:14- And The Rise in Bill Collecting


'Jellyfish, Sea Grasses,
Driftwood, Artifacts
Swept Ashore'

Galveston, Texas
2001.









Governmentalism is not an ideology. It is a method of taking control of money, people, resources, and existing forms of government.

Governmentalists have 'grown' tax-collecting and extended it into the bill-collecting industry. As government defense contractors were bankrupted, their 'state of the art' computer systems were 'confiscated' or 'taken' by government in bankruptcy settlements and re-programmed to tax collect on Americans. TRW, a defense and aeronautics contractor in the race to space, became a building block for Experian, the largest of the Credit Reporting Agencies (CRAs).

The governmental connection somehow gave legitimacy to the credit reporting/bill collecting agencies CRA industry. Like Retail Credit of Atlanta, Georgia, established in 1899, such 'tattletales' and 'snoops' were not uniformly respected in society. Such companies do not buy or sell an independent product. They produce or reproduce someone else's receipts or often questionable records or reports of transactions of buyers and sellers.

Operating in the South, CRAs were not accepted throughout the US, often considered to be parasitic in the business sector. In the North, retailers often sent customers positive 'letters of credit' when a transaction was complete. For example, after the last payment on a installment furniture purchase, the furniture store would send a good 'letter of credit', thanking the customer for their purchase or prompt payment. Such letters could be taken to other retailers to obtain store credit or for other credit purposes.

It is hard to understand how the CRAs were not put out of business. As the CRAs grew, they often were taken to court for libel and defamation of character. CRAs made many settlements in the 1970s for inaccurate and damaging information. As courthouse 'damage control', CRA business practices and structures became more anonymous with unsigned negative credit report letters, automated computerized systems to disseminate their negative reports, using other companies' customers names and information as products to sell to other retailers, banks, and lenders. Now there are multiple 'pseudo-scientific' scales of credit worthiness, or unworthiness, to drive up the cost of credit through higher interest and financial fees.

As CRAs extended into the insurance business with background checks and 'character references', CRAs have driven up the cost of insurance. The concept of higher premiums for 'higher risk' customers became a part of CRA businesses, now known as subsidiaries or affiliates of a diversified business or credit rating companies.

An independent observer looking at such businesses might see 'the big picture'. Insurance-affiliate CRAs often are insurance agents, defaming and libelling customers, to raise the price a customer must pay for government-mandated purchases of insurance.

Auto insurance became an issue for many people in the 1970s and 1980s as state governments began to demand proof of insurance to drive cars. It is true that a drunk driver who has caused accidents and injuries should be held accountable, and 'someone should have to pay' for these expenses other than innocent injured. But this mandate has given insurance agents a form of 'guaranteed income' through government intervention, enforceable for free through government representatives, like traffic police.

It also raises the question of whether politicians and bureaucrats themselves, family, friends, or supporters are insurance agents at some time in their careers or in some other way benefit from insurance mandates. In the late 1990s a major auto insurance company in Ohio subsidized police car computers. This helped the insurance company track insureds for payments or to forcibly sell more auto insurance. Cars not listed on this insurance company's payment files could be stopped and inquiries made, without any driving infraction. This increased the arbitrary nature of police power and possible business and profit to this insurance company. The insurance company stock rose from $10 to $100 per share around this time period.

As governmentalist intervention grows, the cost of products and services rises. As government and business form more interlocking money connections, the risk and the reality of loosing money, property, and true civil liberties also grows.

The 'real economy' has shrunk as government has grown through intervention. The loss of factory jobs in 'big steel', 'big auto', railroad, other major industries which have been by tax-collection or special interest group lawsuit settlement been forced out of business. This has produced profits for governmentalists, seeking to increase their own budgets and salaries.

The problem now is that these profits have now been spent by bankruptcy court personnel, clerks, administrators, attorneys, judges, governmentalist bureaucrats, and others. Many of these now are in financial distress themselves, having 'flipped' too many houses, who ask the government for mortgage assistance and low or no taxation.

Many of the big employers 'have been taken down'. Much business in America now is done in small private franchises of what formerly were large corporations. To stay employed, individuals have started their own small businesses. There is enormous growth of 'cottage industries', home-based businesses, which existed in the much smaller economies in Europe and elsewhere before the industrial revolution 200-300 years ago.

It is ironic that the left, liberal to socialist to communist, philosophies used by the 'black civil rights', 'special needs', alcohol/drug abuse, welfare rights, social welfare, and related special interest groups have used an outmoded philosophy to bankrupt much of the known world. Karl Marx, the political philosopher often referred to, himself believed that the goal of socialism was not a 'central party' soviet form of communism, but a participatory democracy. Socialism was a way of organizing the less politically interested or influential to participate in politics and in business.

Americans of many diverse backgrounds working in large businesses enjoyed higher wages, salaries, and better benefits than many are able to provide for themselves in a home-based business, post-liberal lawsuit agenda.

Home-based financial services companies which bill collect abound. Individuals, more aggressive for money, do not hesitate to try to ruin other individuals who will not agree to send money to them at their bill-collecting companies, by multiple negative credit report computer links. Such individuals can be viciously unfair to others.

One of the meanest examples is negative credit reporting based on current or past employment. Having obtained a 'wage page' from a court bankruptcy file or finance company 'restructuring', such companies pester former employees of now bankrupt companies for bill-collecting money and send these on as 'negative credit reports'.

There is nothing due to a company after the employee performs the work for which he or she was paid. If the company is not satisfied with the work, the employee is asked to leave the company, fired, taken off the schedule, or otherwise no longer paid. Special issues like sales 'charge-backs' for commission-based salespeople are by general agreement in the US to be specified at the time of employment or by employment contract.

It is as unfair to 'trick' a supposed employee into working for free as it is for an employee to not do their work during paid work hours.

As more angry ethnic groups, 3rd World, and foreign people who do not speak English well or understand usual business practices in the US enter business in the US, there are many problems with these basic concepts. The 'business loan' is taken out by the hiring employer not the employee. If an 'Independent Contractor' must take out a loan to become as an 'Independent Distributor, Salesperson' or in some other function, that must be done by that individual, not by a hiring employer signing a prospective employees name or forwarding a job application. These issues must be specified.

What is lost in society in general is the sense of fairness and trust that many or most will be fair. What also is lost is trust in government as a mechanism for righting wrongs. This instability is reflected in a 'boom and bust' economy, not based on supply and demand.


Email mkrause381@gmail.com or mkrause54@yahoo.com to comment or request copies of this or other blogs posted by mary for monthlynotesstaff on http://monthlynotes21.blogspot.com (http://monthlynotes.blogspot.com through '21'). See http://monthlynotes18.blogspot.com or '19' for bloglists of titles and URLs.

Graphic: 'Jellyfish, Sea Grasses, Driftwood, Artifacts Swept Ashore,' Galveston, Texas, 2001, copyright mkrause381@gmail or mkrause54@yahoo.com.

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Governmentalism: 10-Governance & Profit through Bill Collecting


'Palm Trees'
near the Gulf Shore
Southern Texas, 2001.










Governmentalism is not an ideology. It is a method of taking control of money, people, resources, and existing forms of government.

Ivan Ilyich and other writers from socialist/communist backgrounds warned of entanglement of government with business and the ensuing threat to civil rights in America in their books about the rise of the military-industrial complex. Writers who had defected from socialist/communist countries warned of the similarity of the 'central party' organization to the formation of a small, influential military-industrial 'elite', a group of people who controlled very big budgets, defense department contractors and government purchasing agents and their political and military connections.

The military industrial complex created a pattern of government/business contracting policies and procedures. The pattern was emulated and reshaped by the emerging Social Welfare government agency-industrial complex.

One bitter irony of the growth of the social welfare-industrial complex is that the 'ensuing threat to civil rights' was misinterpreted. This threat was meant to warn of a consolidation of money and power in a military-industrial elite, who could then control the US Treasury or overthrow the American Democracy in a military coup to install a socialist/communist military dictatorship.

What happened has been a true threat to overall civil rights. A continuing series of bankrupting 'black civil rights' lawsuits against 'whites'--individuals, businesses perceived as 'white-owned', and a US government perceived as 'white'--has produced a cabinet advocacy level of funding for this movement.

The 'free' items demanded by The Black Panther Party in 1965 match the demands for 'free' items of the social welfare state. 'Free' meaning at 'no cost' has been confused with the meaning of free citizens and the freedoms of US citizens, freedom of speech, religion, assembly, to associate with whomever one chooses, to pursue 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness'.

Most mainstream Americans, perhaps most white Americans asked only for their traditional right to vote, to equally decide government policy, to control government spending, and to be taxed fairly.

Despite the stated 'post-racial' stance of many blacks seeking governmentalist positions, there is an undercurrent of belief among blacks and ethnics that whites somehow agreed to a 'colored takeover' with the election of Obama. Instead what is said privately is 'you can't stop us now'. What whites agreed to was the traditional belief in equality in America without regard to race, color, creed, nationality, or other difference among US citizens.

Clinton continued the racial polarization in the US and made his socialist statements of intent to 'redistribute wealth' openly. The problem now is twofold: 1. the American public has not agreed to a 'transfer of power' to socialists, communists, or 'internationalists', or 'coloreds', or to create a biracial or mixed-race society. 2. The US is facing an almost incomprehensible federal debt of $14 Trillion, there is only debt to 'redistribute'.

As the supposed per person ('per capita') share of that debt has risen to over $42,000, there is much unrest in society. Most taxpayers believe that the expenditures of politicians, for military or social welfare, to appease or to soothe racial or international tensions, for other 'special interest' groups or business, or other purposes are only that--the expenditures of politicians--and the taxpayer does not want to be unfairly taxed, taxed without representation, or viciously tax-collected.

The use of government acquired or stored information databases, computers, information technology, and personnel has not been approved by a referendum vote of a majority of US citizens. Most undoubtedly would not approve government contracts to the major credit reporting agencies ('CRAs'), the Experian, Equifax, TransUnion, and other networks of corporate or franchise bill collection businesses, the 'nameless, faceless' automated computer networks which have ruined their credit, blocked personal or business credit and loans, denied their car loans, new apartment rental or mortgage refinance packages.

The vicious cycle of governmentalist intervention in business and in the everyday lives of citizens uses the CRAs as mechanism. Bill- and tax-collectors, particularly 'privatized' tax collectors with IRS-type 'logos', use CRAs to negatively credit report US citizens to demand payments.

Obamacare would worsen this trend. Obamacare would subject US citizen's to IRS penalties, fees, liens, and other financial hardship for not accepting his mandate to purchase health care insurance or to declare insolvency by enrolling for the 'welfare card'. Either ruins credit.

The United States Code states 'extortion means the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under the color of official right'. The enormity of the growth of US governmentalist networks, including privatized 'look-alike' IRS businesses, and the use of CRAs as mechanism have made this quite common, has damaged overall civil rights in the US, the trust of US citizens in the US government, and the American economy.

The US form of government, the participatory democracy, is the best form of government. But it depends on the honesty, integrity, and fairness of politicians and bureaucrats. If used by the greedy or angry ethnic and racial groups, it can take the form of 'mob rule'. And there is no king or queen to appeal to right the wrongs.


Email mkrause381@gmail.com or mkrause54@yahoo.com to comment or request a copy of this or other blogs posted by mary for monthlynotesstaff on http://monthlynotes21.blogspot.com (http://monthlynotes.blogspot.com through http://monthlynotes21.blogspot.com) on www.google.com. See http://monthlynotes18.blogspot.com and http://monthlynotes19.blogspot.com for blog lists of titles and URLs.

Graphic: An Original Photographic of 'Palm Trees', Near the Gulf Coast, Southern Texas, 2001, copyright mkrause381@gmail.com or mkrause54@yahoo.com.

Monday, March 14, 2011

Governmentalism: 9-Governance, Profit & Social Welfare


'Croc in
Enclosed Tank
for a Swim'

Crocodile
'Chateau'
in Louisiana, 2002.








Many welfare recipients, new legal and illegal immigrants, and wage earners demand 'McMansions' and expensive housing. This social welfare movement appears synchronized with local politiican and banker deals to bulldoze old neighborhoods with truly affordable, 'cheap', housing and rebuild to increase local property value, projected property tax revenues, and so their own wages and salaries.

The US financial sector appears to be loosing to '3rd World' pressures and problems. In the US too there is overpopulation or population not sustainable by the local or domestic economy, unemployment/underemployment, actual or cultural illiteracy, contaminated food and water, hyperinflation, greedy authoritarian politicians and aggressive police, not unlike socialist/communist '3rd World' army-installed dictators, who live in mansions and eat big while many or most of their population is hungry and homeless.

The US is different because many of our current social problems have been created. Uncontrolled immigration, first allowed in the 1960s by Democrat Party President Lyndon B. Johnson after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, brought a large number of poor people to America, an ironic turn of events during LBJ's 'War on Poverty'. Recall that LBJ was from Texas, on the US/Mexican border.

Subsequently, there was growth of social welfare populations demanding programs and politician-proponents demanding funding for such programs. Both have been 'grown' by the Clinton Administration series of 'redistribution of wealth' lawsuits and settlements through ethnic and black race-based initiatives and reduced- or no-tax benefits to Clinton's 'dual citizenship' supporters. These policies have increased social, economic, and budgetary problems in the US.

Many politicians seem to believe that by increasing the budget, they increase their salaries, seen as commissions on budgetary amounts. It is a type of convoluted thinking in which the politicians envision themselves as bankers/lenders seeking increased interest profit by increasing principal with increased federal appropriations.

Welfare, special interest, developmental/mentally retarded & emotionally disturbed, alcoholic, drug abusing, and mentally ill populations and advocates have been permitted to attack the 'normal' segment of society. Such 'special interest' and 'special needs' groups have demanded too many benefits at too high a cost, including 'cash' benefits.

Formerly welfare recipients lived in free 1-, 2-, and 3-bedroom apartments in welfare apartment buildings ('the projects'), ate for free on food stamps, received free medcal and dental care, free public education through elementary school and high school, and other free social welfare assistance.

In New York City in 1994, average welfare benefits were worth about $34,0000 per year for welfare mothers with children. Social welfare demands spiralled into demands to live in 'better' working class and middle-class neighorhoods. Currently in places like Fairfax County, Virginia, now 'bankrupt' ('running a deficit') but too long perceived as one of the wealthiest counties in America, welfare recipients live in $250,000 - $500,000 town houses and million dollar single-family homes, now called 'McMansions'.

Social Welfare demands continue for free higher education in colleges and universities, beyond the already available Pell Grants which now have reached approximately $5,000 in cash value. There are further demands for free job skills programs, business grants and low-interest business loans, more food stamps, 'private school' vouchers, more welfare cash benefits, free bus and other transportation passes, and preferential hiring for jobs for which 'special needs' applicants demand or require 'reasonable accommodation' to perform the job.

When unemployment is high, and jobs are scarce, it is practical and humanitarian to hire 'normals' who can do the job well, without the cost of 'reasonable accommodation'. And because non-subsidized normals really do need the job to pay for rent, food, and basics of everyday life.

But where is the proft in social welfare?

For the welfare recipient the profit is in receiving free housing, food, education, transportation, and job training skills. Receivng $34,000 or more annually in free goods and services is the equivalent of profit, cash value above the cost of producing a 'sold' product or service.

For the wealthy, many of whom may be government contractors who construct, broker, finance, or otherwise provide housing, food, and services, social welfare related businesses are ways to make money and profit by qualifying for grants, loans, contributions, and other monies.

Consider an example from education. The working and lower-middle class, still must pay 'real' taxes from 'real' income, without a tax attorney to fight each denied, tax code deduction. These tax dollars are the local, county, state and federal taxes used to build the school, pay the teachers, and provide books, pencils, paper, blackboards and chalk.

But these taxpayers cannot cover the outrageous costs of even computer equipment in the schools. 'Mainstreaming' 'special needs' students has brought additional expense to local school districts for mobility-devices and special equipment requisitioned for students who require nursing care and special services for deaf, blind, and other handicappd students.

Wealthy computer company executives may donate or sell computer equipment to schools at cost or less 'to do business', and to 'profit by loss' line items on their corporate tax returns.

The actual tax-paying working and lower middle-class is tax collected into financial troubles during a time of underemployment and unemployment as is now true. The shrinking tax base cannot cover expenses for the welfare class, which continues to grow and demand more free products and services.

'Tax breaks' for upper-middle class taxpayers and businesses earning $250,000, now under debate, may allow the free items to continue to flow to the welfare populations. However, this group, said to create jobs in return for such tax breaks, may not really hire 'the general public', only family and friends. And they may not have to pay substantial tax monies if they employ a 'good' tax attorney who 'puts through' their deductions and allows them to keep their income or earnings.

Such businesses may benefit from the welfare voucher system in housing construction, food, education, computers. 'On paper' they could benefit at least until their suppliers begin to demand money, or more money for the supplies, rather than do 'credit' exchange and other deals as a way to continue 'to do business', while securing additional business loans for themselves.

The social welfare system works while there are still goods in the warehouses to sell to the working and middle-class. But what happens when banks slow lending to investors who stop investing in real products and services, given to the welfare class in governmentalist-mediated deals, because their 'loss' line items are 'maxed out' and won't produce any more 'tax breaks'? The 'voucher economy' comes to a close. And everyone waits for 'the next big thing' to stimulate the economy.

Ronald Reagan was very insightful in his 1961 speech opposing the Ferrand National Health Care Bill in 1961, recently published online by "Townhall Conservative Classics". Remembering the American people's rejection of Truman's compulsory health insurance program, Reagan said:

"Back in 1927, an American socialist, Norman Thomas, candidate for President on the Socialist Party ticket, said the American poeple would never vote for socialism. But he said under the name of liberalism the American people will adopt every fragment of the socialist program.

One of the traditional methods of imposing 'statism' or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine. It's very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project. Most people are a little bit reluctant to oppose anything that suggests medical care for people who possibly can't afford it."

The problem we face is the 'hybrid private/state capitalism' governmentalists have developed in the US. Working and lower middle-class citizens are tormented by tax and bill collectors, national and international, for 'real money'.

The voucher system provides free basics of life for the social welfare class. The upper-middle class and wealthy depend on 'real money' tax revenue from the shrinking working- and lower-middle classes. These 'real monies' fund the welfare classes through free social welfare products and services. These products and services are produced and distributed by the upper-middle classes and wealthy, through corporate, philanthropic, and other groups, again drawing from tax revenues for their grant, loan, and other funds.

Reagan recalled James Madison's 1788 speech to the Virginia Convention:
"Since the general civilization of mankind, I believe there are more instances of abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpation".

This is true currently in the enormous amount of duplicative erroneous information, accidental and deliberate, found in tax- and bill-collecting databanks, used to financially ruin the lives of US citizens to fund governmentalist programs and projects.

Viciously unfair tax-collecting has skyrocketed with the growth of 'privatized' Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 'spin-off' businesses, an industry grown with computer grants to welfare recipients during the Clinton years (1992-2000), unfortunately continued during the incentive and bonus days of the George W. Bush Administration (2001-2009), and now reinvigorated during the Obama Administration.

What is required is a referendum on the future of the American Democracy.

Why should any group be tormented for tax revenues if the majority chooses a social welfare socialist society with everything to be free to everyone?

Why should a vulnerable group (the working- and lower-middle class) be tormented for tax revenues by governmentalists who have overspent or create the illusion of providing money for social welfare programs at budgetary amounts in the gadzillions, 'illions' for which there are not even words to describe.


Email mkrause381@gmail.com or mkrause54@yahoo.com to comment or request a copy of this or other blogs posted by mary for monthlynotesstaff on http://monthlynotes21.blogspot.com on www.google.com (or http://monthlynotes.blogspot.com through http://monthlynotes21.blogspot.com). See http://montlynotes18.blogspot.com and http://monthlynotes19.blogspot.com for bloglists of titles and URLs of monthlynotes blogs.

Graphic: An Original Photographic of 'Croc in Enclosed Tank for a Swim', Crocodile 'Chateau', Louisiana, 2002, copyright mkrause381@gmail.com or mkrause54@yahoo.com.